Categories
Coronavirus

The Global Response to Covid-19 Compared

Across the world, government’s responses to the Covid-19 pandemic have diverged from one another. Globally, as of 29th March 2020, there was 684,652 confirmed cases, 32,112 deaths and 142,618 recoveries. What are the stories behind these figures and how do they differ from country to country?

In December 2019, there were reports of a pneumonia outbreak in Wuhan, China. Momentarily, this was seen as a public health anomaly, but it has now culminated in the biggest pandemic of the last century. On the 30th January, the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) Director General, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, praised the Chinese Communist Party’s response to the outbreak, ‘I will praise China again and again, because its actions actually helped in reducing the spread of the coronavirus to other countries.’ He continued, ‘China is doing is doing its best and that helps, and of course in addition to that, we call on all member states to also give that kind of attention, both politically and technically.’

What were the Chinese policies, implemented in response to the pandemic, that Adhanom Ghebreyesus praised?

By mid-January, the Chinese government had introduced harsh measures to control the virus. Primarily, stopping the movement of people in and out of Wuhan, the centre of the outbreak, and in 15 others cities in the Hubei province. In a province of 60 million people, trains and flights were suspended, and roads were blocked.

Following these measures, several Chinese cities were put into lockdown and told only to leave their homes for groceries or essential medical needs. According to The New York Times, 760 million people were isolated in their homes – half of China’s population.

A model simulation at the University of Southampton, UK, has shown that early detection and isolation prevented cases increasing by 67-fold. In result, China’s response prevented approximately 8 million cases by the end of February.

What countries have used the example of China in their response to the pandemic?

Success in Singapore, a country with 5.7 million people, has been accredited to imposing border controls, tracing known carriers, nation-wide testing and clear public messaging. Moreover, new infections have been attributed to returning travellers.

Moreover, Singapore has performed 38,000 tests; approximately, 6,800 examinations per million population keeping their second wave of cases under control. Epidemiologists have conceded that wide spread testing allows for interventions and more informed public health policy. ‘Test. test, test,’ Adhanom Ghebreyesus advised countries at a press conference on the 16th March 2020.

Likewise, success in South Korea has been accountable to countrywide testing, rigorous contact tracing and quarantine of potential carriers. As of the 19th March, South Korea had conducted 64,600 tests. Further to this, in a country of 51.5 million people, there was 8,652 cases, 94 deaths, and now has a case rate in relative decline.

‘If everybody stays in their room and doesn’t go outside at all, which is the Chinese approach, then that also is very effective at cutting down transmissions,’ asserts Martin Hibberd, Professor of Emerging Infectious diseases at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. ‘But in the absence of that type of approach, I think identifying who is positive and making sure those are quarantined is clearly a very effective way.”

How can we compare the example of China, Singapore and South Korea to Europe?

On the 11th March, Italy went into lockdown with the public only being allowed to leave the house for food or medical essentials. Moreover, the government enforced a strict policy on public congregations to control Covid-19 as it has ravaged the Northern region Lombardy and quickly spread to surrounding areas.

As of the 29th March, Italy has reported 10,779 deaths and continues to suffer one of the greatest blows globally from the virus. Moreover, the Italian government and media have been criticised for alternating between alarmism and premature signals of a return to business as usual. A recent pilot of far reaching testing from the University of Padua in the town of Vó, where Italy saw its first Covid-19 related fatality, the virus was eradicated in under 14 days.

Researchers Andrea Crisanti and Antonio Cassone asserted, ‘while we believe it is too late to enact this approach in a city such as Milan, where infections are out of control, there could still be time to do this in the UK before the crisis gets even worse.’ They argued, ‘the government could identify and isolate clusters, quarantine everyone affected, trace their recent contacts, and quarantine and isolate them, too – whether they had symptoms or not.’

Furthermore, on the 15th March, Spain closed down much like other countries in Europe around that time. The Spanish government’s response, and specifically Pedro Sánchez, has been widely condemned for having a late and clumsy response. ‘Spain will only have a handful of cases,’ said Dr Fernando Simón, the head of medical emergencies in Madrid, on the 9th February.

Despite this, on the 29th March there was a death toll of 6,528 with 78,797 confirmed cases. Moreover, it was reported in The Guardian, as of the 26th March, protective clothing and tests were only just being sourced in a country that has a third of the hospital beds of both Austria and Germany.

What does this all mean for the UK?

On the 24th March, the British government announced a UK wide lockdown, asserting people only leave the house for food, one bout of exercise, and essential work. Much like Spanish government’s primary air of ambivalence, Boris Johnson claimed he was shaking hands with coronavirus patients. Regardless, he has tested positive for coronavirus along with 19,522 confirmed cases on the 29th March.

Further to this point, there has been 1,228 deaths in the UK and the government is yet to introduce widespread testing – therefore, skewing mortality rate figures. Boris Johnson, and his scientific advisors’ Sir Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, have been criticised by WHO for their initial ‘herd immunity’ strategy and for not immediately banning large-scale gatherings or closing schools. Additionally, the UK government has been critiqued for failing to sign up to the EU ventilator scheme, the issue of frontline NHS staff not being tested as well as not having protective equipment.

Professor Devi Sridhar of Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh commented, ‘we had a choice early on in the UK’s trajectory to go down the South Korean path of mass testing, isolating carriers of the virus (50% of whom are asymptomatic), tracing all contacts to ensure they isolate as well, and at the same time taking soft measures to delay the spread.’ She asserted, ‘instead, we watched and waited, and whether it was academic navel-gazing, political infighting, a sense of British exceptionalism, or a deliberate choice to minimise economic disruption over saving lives, we have ended up in a position where we are now closer to the Italy scenario than anticipated.’

Ellie Stainforth Mallison

By Ellie Stainforth Mallison

Liberal Arts with Geography student at the University of Nottingham.
Contact: elliejoe21@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s